| No. 4/2005 | Acknowledgements of debt – prescription matters – S12(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Stockdale and another v Stockdale 2004(1) SA 68 (C) | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 4/2005 | Advertising for Lost Deeds - conveyancing | Pg 6 |
| No. 5/2010 | Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (as amended); Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (as amended) - conveyancing - Case Study – Naidoo & another v Naidoo & another (2009) JOL 22674 (N) | Pg 7 - 8 |
| No. 1/2012 | Akai v RAF | Pg 7
|
| No. 5/2011 | AMA Guide 6th Edition– availability | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2011 | AMA Guide 6th Edition– availability | Pg 8 |
| No. 4/2003 | Apportionment of Damages Act 34 of 1956 – Prescription Matters – Vaal Maseru Busdiens (Edms) Bpk v Wascon Siviel CC 2003 (3) SA 226 (O); Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd v Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd 1962(3) 856 E | Pg 7 - 9 |
| No. 2/2011 | Are you too busy to safeguard the reputation of your Firm? – Attorneys Fidelity Fund (misappropriation of trust money) | Pg 3-4 |
| No. 2/2005 | Attorney’s Trust Accounts – unidentified deposits into - Bartlett and Another v Hirschowitz Flionis (W) (case 2914/2001) unreported, 9-7-2004 | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 5/2011 | Attorneys practice and internet related risks – Shadrack Maile | Pg 2 – 4 |
| No. 1/2012 | Attorneys practice and internet related risks (part 2)
| Pg 5 - 6
|
| No. 1/2005 | Barend Petrus Barkhuizen v Ronald Stuart Napier 33129/01 TPD - Prescription Matters – | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2005 | Bartlett and Another v Hirschowitz Flionis (W) (case 2914/2001) unreported, 9-7-2004 - Unidentified deposits into Attorney’s Trust Accounts | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 1/2006 | Benge v RAF (Bisho High Court) (case 545/2003) unreported 11/2055; RAF v Mothupi 2000(4) SA 38 (SCA) - RAF Case Law | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 1/2005 | Bezuidenhout v Road Accident Fund 2003(6) SA 61 (SCA); Krischke v Road Accident Fund 2004 (4) SA 358 - RAF Case Law - Letter to the Editor by Ronald Bobroff | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 3/2003 | Bezuidenhout v The Road Accident Fund 355/2002 SCA (unreported); Padongelukkefonds vs Prinsloo 1999 (3) 569 SCA – Hit and Runs – no physical contact | Pg 1- 3 |
| No. 2/2004 | Blaauwberg Meat Wholesalers CC v Anglo Dutch Meats (Exports) Limited 442/2002 - Prescription Matters – Section 15(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 4/2004 | Bock and others v Duburoro Inc (Pty) Ltd 2004(2) SA 242 (SCA); Findevco (Pty) Ltd v Faceformat SA (Pty) Ltd 2001(1) SA 251 (E) - Parate Executie Clauses in Pledge Agreements | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2011 | Bonds of Security | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2008 | Boot these five dumb office practices – Part 1 – Correspondence déjà vu | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 2/2008 | Boot these five dumb office practices – Part 1 – E-file, then refile | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2008 | Boot these five dumb office practices – Part 1 – E-mail a tree’s worst nightmare | Pg 2 |
| No. 4/2008 | Bridging finance companies – undertaking to – conveyancing - Ridon v Van der Spuy & Partners (Weskaap) Inc. 2002 (2) SA 121 (C) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2010 | Bridging Finance - some measures to protect your conveyancing practice | Pg 2 |
| No. 4/2009 | Bridging Finance Companies – undertakings to- conveyancing | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2011 | Bridging Finance excluded from cover | Pg 1 |
| No. 3/2010 | Bridging finance matters - Guidelines for letters of undertaking in | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2007 | Claims Procedure | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2008 | Claims-made policy - policy queries – Part 2 | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 1 – Competition Act | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 1 – Introduction | Pg 1 |
| No. 1/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 1 – Labour Relations Act and Employee Relations | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 1 – VAT | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 2 – Book Debts, Liabilities and Third-Party Contracts | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 2 – Insolvency Act | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2004 | Common Pitfalls in Business Sales – Part 2 – Warranties | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2004 | Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 - Road Accident Fund v Maphiri 2004 (2) SA 259 (SCA); -RAF Case Law - | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 5/2011 | Consumer Protection Act - letters of engagement and | Pg 4 - 6 |
| No. 5/2010 | Conveyancing - Case Study – Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (as amended); Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (as amended); Naidoo & another v Naidoo & another (2009) JOL 22674 (N) | Pg 7 - 8 |
| No. 2/2008 | Conveyancing – Sale of a going concern | Pg 3 – 4 |
| No. 4/2011 | Conveyancing - Substitution of Conveyancers – Resolution 18 of 2009 | Pg 2-3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Conveyancing – Advertising for Lost Deeds | Pg 6 |
| No. 1/2007 | Conveyancing – Cancelling an Instalment Sale of Land – S19 of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (the “Act”) - Engelbrecht v Merry Hill (Pty) Ltd and others 2006 (3) SA 238 (E); Van Niekerk and another v Favel and another 2006(4) SA 548(W) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2009 | Conveyancing – Customary marriages and ownership of immovable property – Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa (2008) ZACC 23 | Pg 3 – 4 |
| No. 2/2008 | Conveyancing – Easy reference table | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Conveyancing – Electrical Compliance Certificates – article by Selwyn Cohen | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2007 | Conveyancing – Engelbrecht v Merry Hill (Pty) Ltd and others 2006(3) SA 238 (E) – Section 19 of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981; Merry Hill v Engelbrecht (2007) SCA 60 (RSA); Oakley v Bestconstructo (Pty) Ltd 1983 (4) SA 312 (T); Miller v Hall 1984 (1) SA 355 (D); Walker v Minier et Cie (Pty) Ltd 1979 (2) SA 474 (W); Van Niekerk v Favel 2006 (4) SA 4 548 (W); Van Niekerk v Favel (2007) SCA 124 (RSA) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2007 | Conveyancing – Evictions Law here to stay now – Ndlovu v Ngcobo; Bekker and Others v Jika 2003 – Prevention of Illegal Eviction and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (“PIE”) | Pg 4 |
| No. 1/2008 | Conveyancing – Negligence (Mortgage Strategy – 11 Sept 2007) | Pg 4 |
| No. 3/2009 | Conveyancing – Red flag areas in conveyancing practice | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 1/2003 | Conveyancing – risky areas in conveyancing practice – part 2 | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2003 | Conveyancing – Risky Areas in Conveyancing Practice – part 3 | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2011 | Conveyancing – Sharing of fees and touting – The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Andre Louis Nesbitt Berrangé, 9 June2005, CPD, Case Number 3475/04 | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2009 | Conveyancing – The Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970 – Gene and Another v Van der Lith and Another 2004 (3) SA 333 (SCA) | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2008 | Conveyancing – Transfer duty or VAT? | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2008 | Conveyancing – undertaking to bridging companies – Ridon v Van der Spuy & Partners (Weskaap) Inc. 2002 (2) SA 121 (C) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Conveyancing – Undertakings to Bridging Finance Companies | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2006 | Conveyancing – Withholding Tax on Fixed Property Transfers by Non-Residents | Pg 4 |
| No. 3/2007 | Cover for misappropriation of trust money or property | Pg 1 and 4 |
| No. 3/2009 | Currency Translation | Pg 6 |
| No. 1/2009 | Customary marriages and ownership of immovable property – conveyancing – Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa (2008) ZACC 23 | Pg 3 – 4 |
| No. 4/2011 | Daniels & 2 Others v RAF, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, Case No. 8853/10 - Serious Injury claims – RAF Case Law | Pg 6-7 |
| No. 2/2006 | De Jongh v Du Pisanie 2005(SA) 457 (SCA) – conservative approach – RAF v Marunga 2003 (5) SA 164 SCA - RAF Case Law– General Damages awards | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2011 | Debt Collection, Litigation – Nedbank v The National Credit Regulator 662/2009 & 500/2010) [2011] ZASCA 35 (28 March 2011) | Pg 8 |
| No. 2/2010 | Deciding not to accept a mandate Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement | Pg 7 |
| No. 4/2009 | Defamation – Defences | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Defamation – Fair Comment - Johnson v Beckett 1992 (1) SA 762 (A) 779; [SA Associated Newspaper Ltd v Yutar 1969 SA 442 (A)]; [Yazbeck v Seymour 2001 (3) SA 695]; [Hardaker v Phillips 2005 (4) SA 515 (SCA)] | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Defamation – Majolica Pottery (Venda) (Pty) Ltd v Barrow & Coetzee 1999 1 SA 1166 (C) 1179; Heyns v Venter 2003 3 All SA 176 (T); Mohammed and Another v Jassiem 1996 (1) SA 673 (A) at 703; [Mthembi- Mahanyele v Mail & Guardian Ltd 2004 (6) SA 329 (SCA) at 343]; [Mineworkers Investment Co (Pty) Ltd v Modibane 2022 (6) SA 512 (W)] | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Defamation – Qualified Privilege – Van der Berg v Coopers & Lybrand Trust (Pty) Ltd and Others 2001 (2) SA 242 (SCA) ; [Findlay v Knight 1935 AD 58]; [Solomon v Van Leggelo 1938 TPD 75]; [Basner Appelant v Trigger 1946 AD 83] | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2009 | Defamation – What is the award likely to be? [Dikoko v Mokhatla 2006 (6) SA 235 (CC)]; Mogale and Others v Seima 2008 (5) SA 637 (SCA)]; [Van der Berg v Coopers & Lybrand Trust (Pty) Ltd and Others 2001 (2) SA 242 (SCA)]; [Findlay v Knight 1935 AD 58]; [Associated Newspaper Ltd v Yutar 1969 2 SA 442 (A)]; Yazbeck v Seymour 2001 (3) SA 695]; [Joubert v Venter 1985 (1) SA 654 (A)]; [Blumenthal v Shore 1948 (3) SA 671 (A)]; [Moolman v Slovo 1964 (1) SA 760 (W)] | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2003 | Die Trustee’s van die Santania Trust v Beukes en ‘n Ander 65 SATC 177 - A contract is not necessarily self-contained | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 3/2011 | Difference between the Attorneys Insurance Indemnity Fund and the Attorneys Fidelity Fund | Pg 8 |
| No. 3/2009 | Direct Payments System (DPS) / Application by LSNP - RAF News | Pg 6 |
| No. 2/2008 | Discovery of new injury after lodgment -RAF Case Law - Nonkwali v Road Accident Fund (105/2007) [2008] ZASCA 3 (6 March 2008) - | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2009 | Electrical Compliance Certificates – Conveyancing –article by Selwyn Cohen | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2010 | Engagement Management – Risk Management Tips - Managing Client Expectations and Professional Risk, published by Streeton Consulting (Pty) Ltd in 1994 | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Evictions from residential premises – Ndlovu v Ngcobo 2003 (1) SA 113 (SCA) | Pg 1 – 2 |
| No. 2/2006 | Ex Gratia Payments | Pg 1 – 2 |
| No. 3/2007 | Fidelity Fund Guarantee | Pg 4 |
| No. 4/2011 | Francisco Thomas Juscilino Nhambe v Road Accident Fund, Case No. 70721/2009, North High Court 10 November 2010 | Pg 7 |
| No. 4/2010 | Fraudsters targeting attorney trust accounts | Pg 1 (and 8) |
| No. 1/2009 | full and final settlement – Payment in - article from Law News | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Funds Held in Section 78 (2A) Accounts | Pg 2 – 4 |
| No. 1/2005 | Geldenhuys and Joubert v Zendra van Wyk and Road Accident Fund 471/2003 SCA; Mbatha vs Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund 1997 (3) SA 713 (SCA); Moloi vs Road Accident Fund 2001 (3) SA 546 (SCA) - RAF Case Law – the validity of Regulation 2(3) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 | Pg 2 - 4 |
| No. 1/2009 | Gene and Another v Van der Lith and Another 2004 (3) SA 333 (SCA) - Conveyancing – the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970 | Pg 4 |
| No. 5/2010 | General damages - Claims for - for serious injuries under the amended Act - RAF News | Pg 5 |
| No. 2/2006 | General Damages awards – RAF Case Law– De Jongh v Du Pisanie 2005(SA) 457 (SCA) – conservative approach – RAF v Marunga 2003 (5) SA 164 SCA | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 3/2010 | Guidelines for letters of undertaking in bridging finance matters | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2009 | Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa (2008) ZACC 23 - Conveyancing – Customary marriages and ownership of immovable property | Pg 3 – 4 |
| No. 3/2003 | Hit and Runs – no physical contact - Bezuidenhout v The Road Accident Fund 355/2002 SCA (unreported); Padongelukkefonds vs Prinsloo 1999 (3) 569 SCA | Pg 1- 3 |
| No. 5/2011 | Internet related risks and attorneys practice – Shadrack Maile | Pg 2 – 4 |
| No. 3/2005 | K M Blankenfell v Road Accident Fund WLD (case A5043/2004) - Recent decision on Regulation 2(1)(c) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – RAF Case Law | Pg 1 - 3 |
| No. 1/2005 | Krischke v Road Accident Fund 2004 (4) SA 358 - Road Accident Fund vs Thugwana 575/2002 SCA; Bezuidenhout v Road Accident Fund 2003(6) SA 61 (SCA); - RAF Case Law - Letter to the Editor by Ronald Bobroff | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 2/2011 | Kruger v Goss and Another [2009] ZASCA 105 Matrimonial Matters – Maintenance Orders and Deceased Estates | Page 6-7 |
| No. 4/2005 | Legal costs and Writ of Execution – Road Accident Fund v Novathile Nnosa and the Sheriff Pretoria Central 2005 (4) SA 575 T - RAF Case Law – | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 5/2011 | Letters of engagement and the Consumer Protection Act | Pg 4 - 6 |
| No. 2/2010 | Letters of Engagement/Written Mandates Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement | Pg 4 -5 |
| No. 4/2010 | Limited claims declared unconstitutional – RAF Case Law - Mvumvu and two others vs Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, 28 June 2010. | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 4/2011 | Litigation - Debt Collection – Nedbank v The National Credit Regulator 662/2009 & 500/2010) [2011] ZASCA 35 (28 March 2011) | Pg 8 |
| No. 2/2011 | Litigation – New Magistrate’s Court Rules | Pg 7 |
| No. 4/2004 | Litigation Do’s and Don’ts – part 1 | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 1/2005 | Litigation Do’s and Don’ts – Part 2 | Pg 5 |
| No. 2/2011 | Lodging of RAF 4 form after the 2/3 year period – Prof Hennie Klopper - Letters to the Editor | Pg 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | Louw v RAF, South Gauteng High Court, Case no. 49084/09 (Judgment 12 August 2011) | Pg 7 – 8 |
| No. 2/2011 | Maintenance Orders and Deceased Estates – Matrimonial Matters - Kruger v Goss and Another [2009] ZASCA 105 | Pg 6-7 |
| No. 2/2010 | Managing Client Expectations and Professional Risk, published by Streeton Consulting (Pty) Ltd in 1994 - Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2012 | Managing risks brought about by sharing office space | Pg 6 - 7
|
| No. 2/2012 | Managing the risks posed by a fee earning partner | Pg 4 - 6
|
| No. 4/2009 | Mandatory Practice Management | Pg 1 |
| No. 2/2011 | Matrimonial Matters – Maintenance Orders and Deceased Estates – Kruger v Goss and Another [2009] ZASCA 105 | Pg 6-7 |
| No. 5/2010 | Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (as amended) - Conveyancing - Case Study – Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (as amended) - Naidoo & another v Naidoo & another (2009) JOL 22674 (N) | Pg 7 - 8 |
| No. 4/2010 | McCarthy vs Absa Bank 2010 (2)(SA 321 SCA – contractual relationship between bank and client | Pg 7 - 8 |
| No. 4/2010 | Medical Practitioners – list of medical practitioners available to perform assessments – RAF 4 Forms | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2006 | Minister of Law and Order and Others v Zondi 1992 (1) SA 468 (N); Langenhoven v Comyn t/a Rags to Riches 1998 (1) SA 710 (T) - Prescription Matters – Rule 10, Its Application and the Constitution – Part 1 | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2010 | Minister of Safety and Security v De Will 2009 (1) SA 457 (SCA) -prescription of claims against the State - notice i.t.o. s 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings against Certain Organs of State Act | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2011 | Misappropriation of trust money : Are you too busy to safeguard the reputation of your Firm? | Pg 3-4 |
| No. 5/2011 | Mngomezulu v RAF, Gauteng High Court (unreported case no. 4643/2010) | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 5/2011 | Mpondo v RAF, Eastern Cape High Court, CA283/2011, 26 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 5/2010 | MVA undersettlements - RAF News | Pg 5 – 6 |
| No. 2/2011 | Mvumvu & Others v Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, Case No. CCT 67/10 (2011) ZACC1 : RAF Case Law – Passenger Claims | Pg 5-6 |
| No. 5/2010 | Mvumvu and Others v Minister of Transport and Another (7490/2008) - RAF Case Law on Passengers claims under the unamended Act | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 4/2010 | Mvumvu and two others vs Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, 28 June 2010 - RAF Case Law – Limited claims declared unconstitutional | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 5/2010 | Naidoo & another v Naidoo & another (2009) JOL 22674 (N) - Conveyancing - Case Study – Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (as amended); Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (as amended) | Pg 7 - 8 |
| No. 4/2010 | National Credit Regulator v Nedbank Ltd & Others (2009) JOL 24127 (GNP) - the in duplum rule – | Pg 7 |
| No. 2/2003 | Ndlovu v Ngcobo 2003 (1) SA 113 (SCA)- evictions from residential premises | Pg 1 – 2 |
| No. 4/2011 | Nedbank v The National Credit Regulator 662/2009 & 500/2010) [2011] ZASCA 35 (28 March 2011) - Litigation - Debt Collection | Pg 8 |
| No. 2/2011 | New Magistrate’s Court Rules | Pg 7 |
| No. 2/2008 | Nonkwali v Road Accident Fund (105/2007) [2008] ZASCA 3 (6 March 2008) - RAF Case Law – discovery of new injury after lodgment | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2010 | Notice i.t.o. s 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings against Certain Organs of State Act Prescription of claims against The State – Minister of Safety and Security v De Will 2009 (1) SA 457 (SCA) | Pg 2 |
No. 1/2012 | Options to Reduce Limits of Indemnity | Pg 2
|
| No. 4/2004 | Parate Executie Clauses in Pledge Agreements - Bock and others v Duburoro Inc (Pty) Ltd 2004(2) SA 242 (SCA); Findevco (Pty) Ltd v Faceformat SA (Pty) Ltd 2001(1) SA 251 (E); | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2004 | Parate Executie Clauses in Pledge Agreements - Bock and others v Duburoro Inc (Pty) Ltd 2004(2) SA 242 (SCA); Findevco (Pty) Ltd v Faceformat SA (Pty) Ltd 2001(1) SA 251 (E); | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2011 | Passenger Claims - RAF Case Law– Mvumvu & Others v Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, Case No. CCT 67/10 (2011) ZACC1 | Pg 5-6 |
| No. 1/2003 | Passenger for reward – Road Accident Fund v Samela (2002) 2 All SA 158 (A) | Pg 2 |
| No. 5/2010 | Passengers claims under the unamended Act – Mvumvu and Others v Minister of Transport and Another (7490/2008) - RAF Case Law | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 1/2009 | Payment in full and final settlement – article from Law News | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2009 | Prescription – article by Nomzamo Mati - Truter & Venter v Deysel 2006 (4) SA 168 | Pg 6 |
| No. 1/2003 | Prescription – with regard to costs – Santam Limited vs Ethwar 1999(2) SA 244(SCA); Harker v Fussel & Another 2002(1) SA 170 (T) | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Prescription Matters – Acknowledgements of debt – S12(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Stockdale and another v Stockdale 2004(1) SA 68 (C) | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 1/2005 | Prescription Matters – Barend Petrus Barkhuizen v Ronald Stuart Napier 33129/01 TPD | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2007 | Prescription Matters – Barkhuizen v Napier CCT 72/05 | Pg 2 |
| No. 3/2003 | Prescription Matters – Institution of Legal Proceedings Against certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 – Changes to prescriptive periods effected by Act | Pg 14 - 15 |
| No. 4/2006 | Prescription Matters – Rule 10, Its Application and the Constitution – Part 2 – Petterson v Burnside 1940 NPD 403 406; Minister of Law and Order v Zondi 1992 (1) SA 468 (N); Manyasha its v Minister of Law and Order 1999 (2) SA 179 (SCA); Sanford v Haley NO 2004 (3) SA 296 (C) | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2006 | Prescription Matters – Rule 10, Its Application and the Constitution – Part 1 - Minister of Law and Order and Others v Zondi 1992 (1) SA 468 (N); Langenhoven v Comyn t/a Rags to Riches 1998 (1) SA 710 (T) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2004 | Prescription Matters – Section 15(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Blaauwberg Meat Wholesalers CC v Anglo Dutch Meats (Exports) Limited 442/2002 | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 4/2003 | Prescription Matters – The Apportionment of Damages Act 34 of 1956 – Vaal Maseru Busdiens (Edms) Bpk v Wascon Siviel CC 2003 (3) SA 226 (O); Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd v Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd 1962(3) 856 E | Pg 7 - 9 |
| No. 2/2003 | Prescription Matters – The Institution of Legal Proceedings Against certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 – Schedule of changes in prescriptive periods effected by the Act | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2006 | Prescription Matters – Update on Barkhuizen v Napier (T) (case 33129/01) unreported 17.09.2004 – Ronald Stuart Napier v Barend Petrus Barkhuizen (SCA) (case 569/04) unreported 30.11.2005 | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2007 | Prescription Matters – When does prescription begin to run – S12(3) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Truter and another v Deysel 2006(4) SA 168 (SCA) | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2008 | Prescription of RAF Claim - Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide (Minister of Transport Intervening) 2008 (1) SA 535 (CC) - RAF Case Law - Section 23(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 | |
| No. 1/2010 | Prescription of claims against the State – notice i.t.o. s 3(2) of the Institution of Legal Proceedings against Certain Organs of State Act - Minister of Safety and Security v De Will 2009 (1) SA 457 (SCA) | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2011 | Prof Hennie Klopper - Letters to the Editor – lodging of RAF 4 form after the 2/3 year period – Mtambo v Road Accident Fund 2008 1 SA 313 (W) at 318I – 319D; Nomkwali v RAF 2009 4 SA 333 (SCA); Evans v Shield 1980 2 SA 814 (A); Engelbrecht v RAF 2007 6 SA 96 (CC) | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2010 | Professional Indemnity Insurance for Attorneys – sources, functions and types of PI insurance | Pg 4 - 5 |
| No. 2/2010 | Professional Negligence Claims – relevance of original defendant’s ability to pay the debt - Santam Insurance Company Limited vs Fiveash & Cloete (an unreported judgment delivered by Jones J in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court No. 80/97 delivered on 22 January 1998 | Pg 8 |
| No. 2/2009 | Punitive Cost order against the RAF – useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – X Bovungana v Road Accident Fund unreported ECD case no 2090/2007; Roux v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no 397/2002); Paddey v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no EL556/06); Mlatsheni v Road Accident Fund (unreported ECD case no 418/2005] | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2010 | RAF 4 Forms - Medical Practitioners – list of medical practitioners available to perform assessments | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2006 | RAF Amendment Act and Regulation 2(1) (C) - Strauss v Road Accident Fund 2006(1) SA 70(T) – RAF Case Law | Pg 1 |
| No. 4/2004 | RAF Case Law - Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 - Road Accident Fund v Maphiri 2004 (2) SA 259 (SCA); | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 4/2008 | RAF Case Law - Section 23(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Prescription of Claim - Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide (Minister of Transport Intervening) 2008 (1) SA 535 (CC) - | Pg 3 |
| No. 5/2010 | RAF Case Law – three year prescription period declared constitutional – Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide - Constitutional Court 30/09/2010 | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2011 | RAF Case Law - “Serious Injury claims” – Daniels & 2 Others v RAF, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, Case No. 8853/10 | Pg 6-7 |
| No. 5/2011 | RAF Case Law – Assessment of “serious injury claims” in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Mngomezulu v RAF, Gauteng High Court (unreported case no. 4643/2010) | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 5/2011 | RAF Case Law – Assessment of “serious injury claims” in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Louw v RAF, South Gauteng High Court, Case no. 49084/09 (Judgment 12 August 2011) | Pg 7 – 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | RAF Case Law – Assessment of “serious injury claims” in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Smith & Another v RAF, South Gauteng High Court 47697/2009, 29 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | RAF Case Law – Assessment of “serious injury claims” in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Mpondo v RAF, Eastern Cape High Court, CA283/2011, 26 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2006 | RAF Case Law – Benge v RAF (Bisho High Court) (case 545/2003) unreported 11/2055; RAF v Mothupi 2000(4) SA 38 (SCA) | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 2/2008 | RAF Case Law - discovery of new injury after lodgement - Nonkwali v Road Accident Fund (105/2007) [2008] ZASCA 3 (6 March 2008) | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2011 | RAF Case Law - Francisco Thomas Juscilino Nhambe v Road Accident Fund, Case No. 70721/2009, North High Court 10 November 2010 | Pg 7 |
| No. 4/2005 | RAF Case Law – Legal costs and Writ of Execution – Road Accident Fund v Novathile Nnosa and the Sheriff Pretoria Central 2005 (4) SA 575 T | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 1/2005 | RAF Case Law - Letter to the Editor by Ronald Bobroff– Road Accident Fund vs Thugwana 575/2002 SCA; Bezuidenhout v Road Accident Fund 2003(6) SA 61 (SCA); Krischke v Road Accident Fund 2004 (4) SA 358 | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 4/2010 | RAF Case Law – Limited claims declared unconstitutional – Mvumvu and two others vs Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, 28 June 2010. | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 2/2011 | RAF Case Law – Passenger Claims – Mvumvu & Others v Minister of Transport and Road Accident Fund, Case No. CCT 67/10 (2011) ZACC1 | Pg 5-6 |
| No. 2/2006 | RAF Case Law - RAF Amendment Act and Regulation 2(1) (C) - Strauss v Road Accident Fund 2006(1) SA 70(T) – | Pg 1 |
| No. 3/2005 | RAF Case Law – Recent decision on Regulation 2(1)(c) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – K M Blankenfell v Road Accident Fund WLD (case A5043/2004); Thugwana [2004 (3) SA 169 (SCA)]; Makwetland [SCA (case 649/02) unreported – 17 February 2005]; Feerus [WLD (case 9219/03) unreported 08.09.2004] | Pg 1 - 3 |
| No. 3/2004 | RAF Case Law – Road Accident Fund v B Shabangu & Another, SCA 75/03 | Pg 1 - 2 |
| No. 2/2004 | RAF Case Law – Road Accident Fund v Thugwana 575/2002 | Pg 4 - 5 |
| No. 1/2005 | RAF Case Law – The validity of Regulation 2(3) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Geldenhuys and Joubert v Zendra van Wyk and Road Accident Fund 471/2003 SCA; Mbatha vs Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund 1997 (3) SA 713 (SCA); Moloi vs Road Accident Fund 2001 (3) SA 546 (SCA) | Pg 2 - 4 |
| No. 2/2005 | RAF Case Law – Validation of Regulation 2(1) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Road Accident Fund v Bennett Lefu Makwetlane SCA (case 649/02) unreported 17-02-2005 | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2006 | RAF Case Law– General Damages awards – De Jongh v Du Pisanie 2005(SA) 457 (SCA) – conservative approach – RAF v Marunga 2003 (5) SA 164 SCA | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 5/2010 | RAF Case Law –Passengers claims under the unamended Act – Mvumvu and Others v Minister of Transport and Another (7490/2008) | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 5/2011 | RAF Matters – RAF Case Law – Assessment of “serious injury claims” in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Mngomezulu v RAF, Gauteng High Court (unreported case no. 4643/2010) | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 5/2010 | RAF News – Claims for general damages for serious injuries under the amended Act | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2010 | RAF News – Claims for non-patrimonial damages – the completion of the RAF4 Forms | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2008 | RAF News – Direct Payment System | Pg 1 |
| No. 3/2009 | RAF News – Direct Payments System (DPS) / Application by LSNP | Pg 6 |
| No. 5/2010 | RAF News – MVA undersettlements | Pg 5 – 6 |
| No. 1/2008 | RAF News – Regulations to the RAF Amendment Act | Pg 1 |
| No. 5/2010 | RAF News – Road Accident Fund Benefit Scheme | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2007 | RAF News - Thugwana v The Road Accident Fund 2003 (1) SA 310 (T); Engelbrecht v The Road Accident CCT 57/06; Million Rand Project | Pg 2 |
| No. 3/2009 | Red flag areas in conveyancing practice - conveyancing | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 2/2006 | Regulation 2(1) (C) - RAF Amendment Act and - Strauss v Road Accident Fund 2006(1) SA 70(T) | Pg 1 |
| No. 1/2006 | Regulation 2(1)(C) – Thugwana v RAF SCA (case 530/04) unreported 30-11-2004 | Pg 1 |
| No. 3/2005 | Regulation 2(1)(c) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – RAF Case Law | Pg 1 - 3 |
| No. 1/2005 | Regulation 2(3) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996– the validity of -Geldenhuys and Joubert v Zendra van Wyk and Road Accident Fund 471/2003 SCA; Mbatha vs Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accident Fund 1997 (3) SA 713 (SCA); Moloi vs Road Accident Fund 2001 (3) SA 546 (SCA) – RAF Case Law | Pg 2 - 4 |
| No. 2/2010 | Relevance of original defendant’s ability to pay the debt - Professional Negligence Claims – Santam Insurance Company Limited vs Fiveash & Cloete (an unreported judgment delivered by Jones J in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court No. 80/97 delivered on 22 January 1998 | Pg 8 |
| No. 3/2008 | Retired Practitioners - policy queries – Part 1 - claims-made policy | Pg 1 & 4 |
| No. 4/2008 | Ridon v Van der Spuy & Partners (Weskaap) Inc. 2002 (2) SA 121 (C) – conveyancing - undertakings to bridging companies | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2012 | Risk management red flags | Pg 3 - 4
|
| No. 5/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Analysing the facts and the law: Facts from client; facts from the documents; facts that emerge from further investigation and The law/legal issues | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Checks and Balances | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 1/2012 | Risk Management Tips – Communication
| Pg 3 - 4
|
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Dealing with a matter transferred from another attorney | Pg 4 |
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Deciding on and Planning an appropriate strategy (Part 2) | Pg 3 |
| No. 5/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Deciding on and planning an appropriate strategy – Client’s objectives and expectations | Pg 4 |
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Delegation | Pg 6 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – book Managing Client Expectations and Professional Risk, published by Streeton Consulting (Pty) Ltd in 1994 | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement - Letters of Engagement/Written Mandates | Pg 4 -5 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement - Letters of Engagement -Sample Engagement Letters | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement – Deciding not to accept a mandate | Pg 7 |
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – File Note and file order | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 1/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Implementing and managing the strategy | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 2/2010 | Risk Management Tips – Introduction | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Supervision (Part 1) – Consequences of Failure to Supervise Staff - LSNP Rule 89.16; KZNLS Rule 14 (vii); FSLS 17 (13) | Pg 5 |
| No. 2/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Supervision (Part 1) – The Benefits of Supervision | Pg 5 |
| No. 2/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Supervision (Part 1) – The Importance of Supervision | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2011 | Risk Management Tips – Supervision (Part 1) – What needs to be done | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2011 | Risk Management tips – supervision (Part 2) | Pg 3 - 6 |
| No. 4/2011 | Risk Management tips - Supervision of Candidate Attorneys | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2011 | Risk Management tips - Supervision of Other Professionals | Pg 5-6 |
| No. 4/2011 | Risk Management tips - Supervision of Paralegals | Pg 4-5 |
| No. 4/2011 | Risk Management tips - Supervision of Support Staff | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2010 | Risk Management Tips (continued from May 2010) – Managing Client’s expectations – Varying the terms of engagement/mandate – Letter of Engagement | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2010 | Risk Management Tips (continued from May 2010) – Managing Client’s expectations – Effective communication with client | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2010 | Risk Management Tips (continued from May 2010) – Managing Client’s expectations – Closing the engagement - Mazibuko v Singer, 1979 (2) SA 258 (W) | Pg 6 |
| No. 1/2003 | Risky areas in conveyancing practice– part 2 - Conveyancing | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2003 | Risky Areas in Conveyancing Practice – part 3 - conveyancing | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 5/2010 | Road Accident Fund Benefit Scheme - RAF News | Pg 4 |
| No. 3/2004 | Road Accident Fund v B Shabangu & Another, SCA 75/03 - RAF Case Law | Pg 1 - 2 |
| No. 2/2005 | Road Accident Fund v Bennett Lefu Makwetlane SCA (case 649/02) unreported 17-02-2005 - RAF Case Law – Validation of Regulation 2(1) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 | Pg 2 |
| No. 5/2010 | Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide - Constitutional Court 30/09/2010 -RAF Case Law – three year prescription period declared constitutional | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2008 | Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide (Minister of Transport Intervening) 2008 (1) SA 535 (CC) - RAF Case Law - Section 23(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Prescription of Claim | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Road Accident Fund v Novathile Nnosa and the Sheriff Pretoria Central 2005 (4) SA 575 T - RAF Case Law – Legal costs and Writ of Execution | Pg 4 – 5 |
| No. 1/2003 | Road Accident Fund v Samela (2002) 2 All SA 158 (A) - passenger for reward | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2004 | Road Accident Fund v Thugwana 575/2002 - RAF Case Law | Pg 4 - 5 |
| No. 1/2005 | Road Accident Fund vs Thugwana 575/2002 SCA; Bezuidenhout v Road Accident Fund 2003(6) SA 61 (SCA); – Road Accident Fund vs Thugwana 575/2002 SCA - Krischke v Road Accident Fund 2004 (4) SA 358 - RAF Case Law - Letter to the Editor by Ronald Bobroff | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 2/2012 | Roestof v Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc | Pg 8
|
| No. 2/2006 | Rule 10, Its Application and the Constitution – Part 1 - Prescription Matters – Minister of Law and Order and Others v Zondi 1992 (1) SA 468 (N); Langenhoven v Comyn t/a Rags to Riches 1998 (1) SA 710 (T) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2005 | S12(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Stockdale and another v Stockdale 2004(1) SA 68 (C) - Prescription Matters – Acknowledgements of debt | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 2/2010 | Sample Engagement Letters - Risk Management Tips – Engagement Management – Setting up the engagement - Letters of Engagement | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 2/2010 | Santam Insurance Company Limited vs Fiveash & Cloete (an unreported judgment delivered by Jones J in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court No. 80/97 delivered on 22 January 1998 - Professional Negligence Claims – relevance of original defendant’s ability to pay the debt | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2003 | Santam Limited vs Ethwar 1999(2) SA 244(SCA - Prescription – with regard to costs | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2004 | Section 15(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – Prescription Matters – Blaauwberg Meat Wholesalers CC v Anglo Dutch Meats (Exports) Limited 442/2002 | Pg 5 - 7 |
| No. 4/2008 | Section 23(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Prescription of Claim -Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide (Minister of Transport Intervening) 2008 (1) SA 535 (CC) - RAF Case Law | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2008 | Section 23(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Prescription of Claim - Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide (Minister of Transport Intervening) 2008 (1) SA 535 (CC) - RAF Case Law | |
| No. 1/2008 | Section 54 of the Close Corporations Act 69 of 1984 (the “Act”) – J & K Timbers (Pty) Ltd t/a Tegs Timbers v GL & S Furniture Enterprises CC 2005 (3) SA 223 (N) | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Section 78 (2A) Accounts - funds held in | Pg 2 – 4 |
| No. 4/2011 | Serious Injury claims – Daniels & 2 Others v RAF, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, Case No. 8853/10 | Pg 6-7 |
| No. 5/2011 | Serious injury claims, assessment of in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Mngomezulu v RAF, Gauteng High Court (unreported case no. 4643/2010) | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 5/2011 | Serious injury claims, assessment of in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Louw v RAF, South Gauteng High Court, Case no. 49084/09 (Judgment 12 August 2011) | Pg 7 – 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | Serious injury claims, assessment of in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Smith & Another v RAF, South Gauteng High Court 47697/2009, 29 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | Serious injury claims, assessment of in terms of Section 17 of the RAF Act of 1996 (as amended) and Regulation 3 (made under s26 of the Amended Act) – Mpondo v RAF, Eastern Cape High Court, CA283/2011, 26 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 1/2011 | Sharing of fees and touting – Conveyancing - The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Andre Louis Nesbitt Berrangé, 9 June2005, CPD, Case No 3475/04 | Pg 8 |
| No. 5/2011 | Smith & Another v RAF, South Gauteng High Court 47697/2009, 29 April 2011 | Pg 8 |
| No. 2/2010 | Some measures to protect your conveyancing practice – bridging finance | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2010 | Some measures to protect your conveyancing practice – conveyancing in general | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2005 | Stockdale and another v Stockdale 2004(1) SA 68 (C) - Prescription Matters – Acknowledgements of debt – S12(1) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 2/2006 | Strauss v Road Accident Fund 2006(1) SA 70(T) - RAF Amendment Act and Regulation 2(1) (C) | Pg 1 |
| No. 4/2011 | Substitution of Conveyancers – Resolution 18 of 2009 - Conveyancing | Pg 2-3 |
| No. 3/2007 | The Attorneys Fidelity Fund Professional Indemnity Insurance Scheme – 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 | Pg 2 - 4 |
| No. 4/2010 | The completion of the RAF4 Forms - RAF News – Claims for non-patrimonial damages | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2010 | The in duplum rule – National Credit Regulator v Nedbank Ltd & Others (2009) JOL 24127 (GNP) | Pg 7 |
| No. 2/2003 | The Institution of Legal Proceedings Against certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 – Schedule of changes in prescriptive periods effected by the Act - Prescription Matters | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2011 | The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Andre Louis Nesbitt Berrangé, 9 June2005, CPD, Case No 3475/04 - Conveyancing – Sharing of fees and touting | Pg 8 |
| No. 4/2007 | The New Age of Majority – Section 17 of Children’s Act of 2005 | Pg 2 |
| No. 3/2003 | The Road Accident Fund v R Scholtz 111/2002 SCA - Toerien update | Pg 1- 3 |
| No. 1/2009 | The Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970 – Gene and Another v Van der Lith and Another 2004 (3) SA 333 (SCA) - conveyancing | Pg 4 |
| No. 1/2012 | Theft by staff members
| Pg 2 - 3
|
| No. 5/2010 | Three year prescription period declared constitutional – RAF Case Law – Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide -Constitutional Court 30/09/2010 | Pg 5 |
| No. 1/2006 | Thugwana v RAF SCA (case 530/04) unreported 30-11-2004 - Regulation 2(1)(C) | Pg 1 |
| No. 3/2003 | Toerien update – The Road Accident Fund v R Scholtz 111/2002 SCA; | Pg 1- 3 |
| No. 1/2003 | Trustee’s Authority to act as such – Part 2 – Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe en Andere 2002(2) SA 519 C; Simplex (Pty) Ltd v Van der Merwe and others NNO 1996(1) SA 111 W | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 4/2009 | Truter & Venter v Deysel 2006 (4) SA 168 - Prescription – article by Nomzamo Mati | Pg 5 |
| No. 1/2012 | Tshabangu v RAF
| Pg 7 - 8
|
| No. 4/2008 | Undertaking to bridging companies – Ridon v Van der Spuy & Partners (Weskaap) Inc. 2002 (2) SA 121 (C) - Conveyancing | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2005 | Unidentified deposits into Attorney’s Trust Accounts – Bartlett and Another v Hirschowitz Flionis (W) (case 2914/2001) unreported, 9-7-2004 | Pg 2 – 3 |
| No. 1/2006 | Update on Barkhuizen v Napier (T) (case 33129/01) unreported 17.09.2004 – Ronald Stuart Napier v Barend Petrus Barkhuizen (SCA) (case 569/04) unreported 30.11.2005 - Prescription Matters | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2009 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Punitive Cost order against the RAF – X Bovungana v Road Accident Fund unreported ECD case no 2090/2007; Roux v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no 397/2002); Paddey v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no EL556/06); Mlatsheni v Road Accident Fund (unreported ECD case no 418/2005] | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 1/2008 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners - Recognition of Customary Marriages in RAF claims – Nontobeko Virginia Gasa v Road Accident Fund and 5 others SCA (CASE 579/06) unreported 19-11-07 | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 2/2007 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Regulation 2(1)(c) of The Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Engelbrecht v The Road Fund CCT 57/06; Thugwana v The Road Accident Fund 2003 (1) SA 310 (T); Road Accident Fund v Makwetlane 2005 (4) SA 51 (SCA) | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2006 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Regulation 2(1)(c) of The Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Strauss v Road Accident Fund 2006(1) SA 70(T); Mawethu v Road Accident Fund 2005 (6) SA 485 W; RAF v Sheldon Smith [2006] SCA 123 (RSA); Thugwana 2004 (3) SA 169 SCA ; Makwetlane 2005(4) SA 51 SCA | Pg 2 -3 |
| No. 1/2007 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – S17 (5) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Claims by Suppliers of Medical Services – Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund 2066 (3) SA 88 T | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2008 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners - Section 17(5) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Claims by suppliers of Medical Services – Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund SCA (CASE 179/06) unreported 29-05-07 | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2007 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Waiver by fund of two-year period in terms of Regulation 2 (3) – RAF v Ngubane (2007) SCA 114 (RSA); van Wyk v Geldenhuys and Joubert and Another 2005 (2) SA 512 (SCA) | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Specialist Physician / General Surgeon | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Pulmonologist | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Cardiologist | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Urologist | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Gynaecologist | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Paediatrician | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 3 – Actuary | Pg 3 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Architect and Builder | Pg 4 - 5 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Psychologist | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Psychiatrist | Pg 5 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Neuropsychologist | Pg 5 - 6 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Speech and Audiologist | Pg 6 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Educational Psychologist | Pg 6 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Industrial Psychologist | Pg 6 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Ophthalmologist | Pg 6 - 7 |
| No. 4/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 2 – Optometrist | Pg 7 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Orthopaedic Surgeon | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Neurologist | Pg 2 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Neurosurgeon | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Occupational Therapist | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Hand Expert | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Maxillo-Facial Surgeon | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Prosthetic and Orthotic Consultant | Pg 3 |
| No. 2/2003 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – Who to use when you sue – Part 1 – Mobility Expert | Pg 3 |
| No. 1/2004 | Useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – who to use when you sue (referring to Risk Alert Bulletin 2/2003) – neurologists and neurosurgeons - Letter to Editor | Pg 3 - 4 |
| No. 4/2003 | Vaal Maseru Busdiens (Edms) Bpk v Wascon Siviel CC 2003 (3) SA 226 (O); Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd v Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd 1962(3) 856 E - Prescription Matters – he Apportionment of Damages Act 34 of 1956 | Pg 7 - 9 |
| No. 2/2005 | Validation of Regulation 2(1) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 – Road Accident Fund v Bennett Lefu Makwetlane SCA (case 649/02) unreported 17-02-2005 - RAF Case Law | Pg 2 |
| No. 1/2003 | Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe en Andere 2002(2) SA 519 C; Simplex (Pty) Ltd v Van der Merwe and others NNO 1996(1) SA 111 W - Trustee’s Authority to act as such – Part 2 | Pg 2 - 3 |
| No. 2/2012 | Why you should be talking to your actuary
| Pg 7 - 8
|
| No. 2/2006 | Withholding Tax on Fixed Property Transfers by Non-Residents - Conveyancing | Pg 4 |
| No. 2/2009 | X Bovungana v Road Accident Fund unreported ECD case no 2090/2007; Roux v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no 397/2002); Paddey v Road Accident Fund (unreported case no EL556/06); Mlatsheni v Road Accident Fund (unreported ECD case no 418/2005] - useful Tips for MVA Practitioners – punitive Cost order against the RAF | Pg 3 - 4 |
Risk Alert Bulletin